Last Call for Social Security Benefits File-And-Suspend – April 29 2016

Last fall, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 changed the rules to eliminate two popular Social Security claiming strategies for married couples: File-and-Suspend, and Restricted Application.

Who should be considering this?

Anyone who has at least met the full retirement age of 66, and is not yet age 70, should be considering whether to submit a file-and-suspend request by April 29.  If you or someone you know is within this age range, please share this article and be aware that you/they have a very short window to meet the deadline. Anyone who wants to be “grandfathered” under the old (current, and more favorable) rules has only one week left to complete their Social Security application and suspension request by the April 29 deadline!

What is File-and-Suspend?

On the surface, it seems too good to be true.  Let’s say you have a married couple, where (let’s say) the husband has earned higher yearly income than his wife.  That means he has contributed more to Social Security over his working life.  The husband files for Social Security benefits at full retirement age (currently age 66) and then immediately files to suspend those benefits.

As a result of this simple maneuver, the wife is now entitled to immediately receive Social Security spousal benefits equal to half of the husband’s full retirement benefits that were just suspended.  She would do this if 50% of the husband’s benefit is higher than she would have received if she had simply claimed her own Social Security payments.

Because he suspended his benefits, the husband can continue working, and wait until age 70 to start receiving Social Security checks in his own name.  Why would he do that?  Because each year of deferral allows him to accumulate more credits—effectively raising his monthly benefits 8% a year, which is considerably higher than the inflation rate.  At that time, the wife would stop claiming the husband’s benefits and start receiving her own Social Security checks.  If she was working at the time, she might have raised the amount she could claim under her own name.

Presto!  More money now, more money later.

The original rationale behind the file and suspend strategy was to encourage more seniors to continue working.  The rationale behind ending it is that it was becoming a drain on the Social Security system.  Moreover, Congress was looking for money to offset a huge increase in Medicare Part B premiums for individuals not yet receiving Social Security payments.

Notably, the tactic is a moot point for anyone who has already claimed benefits, or who doesn’t plan to delay benefits going forward. Nor is file-and-suspend relevant for widows (who don’t need file-and-suspend to coordinate between retirement and survivor benefits), nor for divorcees (who rely on the Restricted Application strategy instead, which remains available after April 29 for anyone who was born in 1953 or prior).

Nonetheless, for married couples (and some parents with children) who are in the age 66-70 window and have not yet claimed their benefits, but where one person could activate a spousal or dependent child benefit for someone else while delaying their own benefit, only a small time window remains to submit a File-and-Suspend request before the rules are changed forever! And arguably, anyone who is single and doesn’t care about spousal benefits, but simply wants to preserve the right to “undo” and reinstate their delay decision in the next few years, may want to consider submitting a request to File-and-Suspend by April 29 as well!

If you or someone you know wishes to inquire or apply for this benefit, you should visit www.ssa.gov or call your local social security office.

If you would like to discuss your social security benefits situation or any other financial planning matters, please don’t hesitate to contact us or visit our website at http://www.ydfs.com. We are a fee-only fiduciary financial planning firm that always puts your interests first.  If you are not a client yet, an initial consultation is complimentary and there is never any pressure or hidden sales pitch.

Sources:
http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Saving-Money/2015/1102/Social-Security-This-strategy-to-maximize-benefits-may-soon-disappear

http://www.dailylocal.com/business/20151102/colliton-budget-plan-ends-social-security-file-and-suspend

The MoneyGeek thanks guest writers Michael Kitces and Bob Veres for their contributions to this post.

An Estate Plan for your Digital Assets

In recent years, a new category of assets has appeared on the scene, which can be more complicated to pass on at someone’s death than stocks, bonds and cash.  The list includes such valuable property as digital domain names, social media accounts, websites and blogs that you manage, and pretty much anything stored in the digital "cloud."  In addition, if you were to die tomorrow, would your heirs know the pass-codes to access your iPad or smartphone?  Or, for that matter, your e-mail account or the Amazon.com or iTunes shopping accounts you’ve set up?  Would they know how to shut down your Facebook account, or would it live on after your death?

A service called Everplans has created a listing of these and other digital assets that you might consider in your estate plan, and recommends that you share your logins and passwords with a digital executor or heirs.  If the account or asset has value (airline miles or hotel rewards programs, domain names) these should be transferred to specific heirs—and you can include these bequests in your will.  Other assets should probably be shut down or discontinued, which means your digital executor should probably be a detail-oriented person with some technical familiarity.

The site also provides a guide to how to shut down accounts; click on “F,” select “Facebook,” and you’re taken to a site (https://www.everplans.com/articles/how-to-close-a-facebook-account-when-someone-dies) which tells you how to deactivate or delete the account.  Note that each option requires the digital executor to be able to log into the site first; otherwise that person would have to submit your birth and death certificates and proof of authority under local law that he/she is your lawful representative.  (The executor can also “memorialize” your account, which means freezing it from outside participation.)

The point here is that even if you know who would get your house and retirement assets if you were hit by a bus tomorrow, you could still be leaving a mess to your heirs unless you clean up your digital assets as well.

Sources:

https://www.everplans.com/articles/a-helpful-overview-of-all-your-digital-property-and-digital-assets

The MoneyGeek thanks guest writer Bob Veres for his contribution to this post

Could You Stomach the Perfect Investment?

Suppose a mutual fund knew for sure which 10% of the largest U.S. companies would earn the highest returns over the next five years, over each upcoming five-year period. You’d invest in that fund and hang tight, right?

A research company called Alpha Architect, recently posed this as an interesting thought experiment. It divided all of the 500 largest U.S. stocks into deciles, and imagined that a hypothetical fund was investing in only the upper 10% returning stocks in the first five-year period, starting on January 1, 1927, and every five years it would switch the portfolio to the future top 10% of all stocks. (Hindsight makes it a lot easier to model what would happen if we were blessed with perfect foresight.)

Okay, so now you’re invested, and if you could have bought and held this magical fund, then at the end of the year 2009, you’d have earned just under 29% a year. What could be easier?

But, not knowing that this fund had a workable crystal ball, would you have held on while it was experiencing a 75.96% downturn during a particularly bad bear market starting in 1929? Or might you have been tempted to bail to safer bonds at some point during that catastrophe? This perfect fund fell more than 44% during a one-year period starting at the end of March, 1937, and overall it experienced drops of 20% or more nine times during your holding period—plus an additional 19% draw down that took it within a whisker of bear market territory.

Some of the times when you might have been sorely tempted to jump ship: the 2000-2001 downturn, when your marvelous fund lost 34% while the S&P 500 was only down 21%. Or a precipitous 22.11% downturn starting at the end of 1974, when the S&P 500 was gaining 19.94%. Or the 19.91% drop from the end of September through the end of November 2002, at a time when the S&P 500 was sailing along with a 15.28% positive return. The long-term returns were terrific, but it took a lot of stomach to hold on for the full ride.

The authors also looked at an even more marvelous manager, who not only bought only the 10% of stocks that would go up the most in the subsequent five years, but also shorted the 10% of stocks that would experience the worst 5-year performance (shorting means that you borrow and sell a stock first, hoping it goes down, then buy it back when it's cheaper). The mechanics of this fund are a little more complicated, but the results were even more dramatic: the fund experienced enormous losses at times when the S&P 500 was experiencing gains—as you can see from the accompanying chart, which shows this perfect fund’s biggest losses compared with S&P 500 returns during the same period. You really had to be intrepid to hold on and claim the fund’s remarkable 39.74% annualized returns.

The point? The authors say that even if God (who presumably has perfect foresight) were running a mutual fund, He would have lost a lot of investors who lost faith in his management skill during those times when the markets experienced rough patches. It’s fundamentally a lesson in humility and patience; great long-term track records are not immune from pullbacks, and our all-too-human tendency is to lose faith in the face of adversity.

What does this tell us? It indicates that investing is hard, because our psychological make-up tends to push us to do the wrong thing at the wrong time when it comes to our money. At the risk of sounding self-serving, having an advisor manage your assets can help put a barrier between your natural instincts and the markets. And who can't use a little coaching and seasoned expertise ...?

Sources:

http://blog.alphaarchitect.com/2016/02/02/even-god-would-get-fired-as-an-active-investor/#.VrD5akrsaMY.twitter

Recovery—For How Long?

On Tuesday of this week, the U.S. stock markets (S&P 500 index) went up 2.39%, the highest one-day return in a month. Analysts attributed the rise to a variety of economic news that suggested that the American economy is not, after all, plunging into recession. The buoyant mood among investors may not last, but for many, it’s a welcome sign that things may not be as gloomy as they seemed just a month ago.

In fact, the S&P 500 only dropped about 12%, from 2078.36 at the end of December 2015 to the bottom of 1829.08 on February 11—despite widespread predictions of a 20% bear market. Since then, it has risen on shaky legs back to more than 1999, just 79 points from breaking even on the year. One more day like Tuesday would erase nearly all of the damage in 2016.

The good economic news involved construction spending, which reached its highest level since 2007. Oil prices were also gaining ground, although it’s hard to see why the average American would find reason to cheer about that. In addition, new orders and inventories stabilized in the manufacturing sector, after experiencing downturns in the last quarter of 2015.  On Friday, The February jobs report showed that the economy created 242,000 jobs and unemployment remains at a low 4.9%.  Other factors include the possibility that U.S. stock investors may finally have decided that declines in the Chinese markets are not going to directly affect the value of American-based businesses.

None of this means that we know what will happen next. Neither we nor any of the pundits you see on the financial news have any idea whether that long-awaited 20% decline will materialize, or the markets will continue to recover and we’ll all look back on February 11 prices as a great time to buy. But it’s worth reflecting on how unexpected this latest rally has been at a time when it seemed that all the news pointed to more pain and decline. Anybody who believed the pundits and fully retreated to the sidelines after the January selloff is now sitting on losses and wondering whether to jump in now and hope the gains continue, or wait and hope for another downturn, and risk losing even more ground if this turns out to be a long-term rally. This is not to say that hedging or taking some bull market profits off the table is still not a good idea. All-or-nothing investing is almost never a good idea.

We can never see the next turn in the market roller coaster, but long-term, the markets seem to operate under the opposite of the pull of gravity. You and I know with some degree of certainty in which direction the next 100% market move will be, even if we can’t pinpoint when or where.

Sources:

http://www.businessinsider.com/the-stock-market-is-over-china-2016-2

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-02-29/japan-futures-down-on-strong-yen-as-china-stimulus-buoys-aussie

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/wall-st-open-higher-oil-143344528.html

The MoneyGeek thanks guest writer Bob Veres for his contribution to this post

Balance Risk, Reward by Diversifying College Savings

I wanted to share the link to the "Balance risk, reward by diversifying college savings" article, in which I am quoted.  It was published on the U.S. News & World Report website.  The author of the article is Deborah Ziff, a Chicago area-based freelance education reporter for U.S. News, covering college savings and 529 plans.

To read this interesting article, click here.